are talking about?
What the hell?
How can that be?
I thought that Right Wing commentators weren't just blow-hards who think they have the moral high ground just because they are louder than everybody.
This Right-Wing ass walked into a buzz saw on hardball the other night and it was pathetic.
Pleasantly pathetic.
Category: HumbleStuff
« A couple of tunes that came to me | Home | My Horoscope today. Could be pretty much »
Comments
I almost posted this yesterday b/c it's great fun watching this guy get spanked. Kevin James walks into a smackdown indeed.
Posted by: Toronto Mike | May 19, 2008 / 19:30
Kevin James is like most Right Wing Americans I've met. No need to explain....I think?
Posted by: Mike from Lowville | May 20, 2008 / 09:40
Well that was pretty Funny. The problem with tards like that is anyone whose even a little conservative gets painted wiyth the same brush. I'm conservative in some ways and pretty libeal in others but I'd vote NDP just to not be associated with that guy. "What did Chamberlain do? Appeasment! Comedy GOLD I TellS ya!
Posted by: james edgar | May 20, 2008 / 14:42
I think the guy went to the same school as Bush.
Posted by: Timothy Miller | May 21, 2008 / 03:56
A couple of notes for perspective:
1) This guy is clearly a loud-mouth Left Coast radio host, nothing more. He obviously doesn't know the answer to Chris's question. (I've never even heard of this guy...)
2) He was also obviously picked on purpose to present the worst possible argument for the conservative side. That's what Chris Matthews does.
3) It was a skillful change of topic by Matthews to avoid talking about Obama's shortcomings.
4) President Bush WAS most likely talking about Obama when he made those "appeasement" comments. But the President was also CORRECT.
5) If you end up sounding less knowledgable than an Air America host, you KNOW you're in trouble.
You da best, Howard!
Posted by: Jon May | May 21, 2008 / 13:14
When Obama becomes president and the US is attached because he’s perceived as a weakling by the terrorists, Canadians won’t be laughing. After all with the US hurt who would protect us???
As Canadians we better hope McCain becomes prez and not that buddy who’s a good orator with no experience and a suspect past.
Posted by: Argie | May 21, 2008 / 13:47
Hey Argue? Did you need to say that twice to get yourself to believe that? Ple-eeze. Canada does not need the US for protection. We need protection AGAINST the US. For that, we have the rest of the world for allies.
Posted by: Mike from Lowville | May 23, 2008 / 09:12
Wrong again mike.
Not only do Canadians need the US’s protection the same applies to all democratic countries around the world. Without it we’d either be speaking Russian or German on a regular basis. And that’s not hyperbole.
Posted by: Argie | May 23, 2008 / 10:06
I believe the tense you're looking for there Argie is past. As in, the world needED the assistance/protection of the U.S. I'm not sure that's the case any more.
Posted by: Ajax Mike | June 1, 2008 / 22:37