Why do I want Tiger to win????

It's sometimes hard for me to articulate. Trust me, I've tried.
-He's the best that's ever played the game and I get to be alive while it's actually happening...
-I've been a golf fan since I was a kid and for the first time a Golfer is the most dominant athlete on the planet.
-He's so excellent at the game and such an enigma away from it that all you have to concentrate on his is ability as opposed to his "real life" which most of us don't know much about.
Actually all of the above.
I came across this article from a dude named Chris Ballard at SI and it goes along way towards explaining my/our fascination with TW.

Fans will never know Tiger Woods, that's why watching him is fun

When the Masters begins this week, we know what to expect from Tiger Woods -- the person, that is, not the golfer. He will be polite but not forthcoming, pleasant but elusive. Tiger does not Twitter or Dance with Stars or pose, brooding and shirtless, for fashion magazines. He declines nearly all media requests and named his $20 million yacht Privacy; you even need a password to read the infrequent, mundane posts on his website.

Why? Lore has it that ever since a 1997 GQ story portrayed him as being just like any other college kid, he has retreated into his shell (super-lightweight titanium, now available from Nike). And many have bemoaned this. They want to really know Tiger, to understand what makes him tick. If only he showed his human side more often, these people say, we could truly embrace him.

But I for one don't want to embrace him. Rather, I think Tiger's aloofness is precisely why he is so much fun to watch. Because we get so little from Woods, we can focus solely on his performance. I don't want Tiger to drain a huge putt and then, 30 minutes later, send out a tweet saying: OMG, WAS SOOOO NERVOUS ON THAT ONE!!! Instead, give me Tiger in the moment, cursing at his clubs, roaring in triumph or sulking like a man who cannot, will not, abide imperfection. Softer side? I like to imagine there is no softer side to Woods, that he becomes incensed at the washing machine if it doesn't properly whiten his T's, that he exchanges overexuberant high-fives with his wife after conquering the lawn with his push mower. (C'mon, Tiger would never use a riding mower.)

Think about it. When we talk about Alex Rodriguez or Terrell Owens, we talk about a lot more than baseball or football, and that's our loss. But when we talk about Tiger, we talk about golf. Will he break Nicklaus's record? Has he remade his swing? If you had straight-up odds before a tournament, would you choose Tiger or the rest of the field? (Seriously, you're taking the field?)

He's almost like an old-time movie star, one we see only in character. Even his ads stay on message. Rather than Tiger at home, goofing with the family, we see Tiger the Competitor, nailing a 50-foot chip shot, or Tiger the Sports Messiah, walking on water. It only increases the distance between him and us. Hell, his mystique is such that during the AT&T National in 2007, he sparked a round of applause when he stepped out of a portable toilet on the course, as if he'd just peed excellence.

Sure there is a trade-off. Word is that Woods is actually a pretty funny guy among friends -- when his buddy Charles Barkley went to prison for three days, Tiger sent him soap-on-a-rope. But if forgoing the personal details means we can also forgo the rest of the dreck that comes with an athlete's overexposure, then it's worth it. I used to respect Jason Taylor. Now all I can think about is the damn cha-cha.

Tiger remains first and foremost a competitor. A month ago, when he returned from knee surgery to play in the Accenture Match Play tournament, I watched as most of the Houston Rockets gathered around a small ceiling-mounted TV after practice to watch, gazing up as if Woods were Neil Armstrong. "I want Tiger to win every single time he plays," forward Shane Battier said. "But I don't want it to be easy. I want him to be pressed. I want it to come down to the end every time." Asked why, Battier said solemnly, "Because we've never seen another competitor like him, other than Michael Jordan. He never misses a putt that counts. Never."

Of course this isn't true, but it feels that way, doesn't it? And whereas MJ played a team sport, in which chemistry is paramount -- meaning he had no choice but to relate to people -- Woods doesn't, and so ... he doesn't. Think this doesn't give him an advantage over his competitors? Who are you going to fear more: the affable, talented golfer who is everybody's pal, or the aloof one who can seem like a golf cyborg -- the Birdienator 2000? (What's more, on the occasions that Tiger does become emotional, like after sinking a ridiculous putt or when he hugged his father after winning his first Masters, it is all the more powerful.)

Take it from a man well-versed in the psyche of the killer competitor: Jordan's longtime agent, David Falk. "Fans get what I call functional fixity," says Falk. "They assume a player is the same way outside his sport as when playing. Tiger's a private guy, but who cares? His whole essence is to eclipse Nicklaus and win majors. It's the only reason he plays."

And, if you ask me, it's the only reason we need to watch.

And if you ask me, I'd say the same.

Category: Comments

« This Video made me very happy....you too I'll bet. | Home | H+F Podcast now just 2.5 weeks away... »

Comments

I hope Tiger wins, too. Mainly so I can say I watched the greatest golfer in the history of the game during his prime.

Gretzky, Jordan and Tiger... I'm just sorry I missed Babe Ruth and Muhammad Ali.


I hope our Mikey wins. I sometimes wonder how Tiger would do back in the day's of Bobby Jones. Could he handle the inferior equipment and course conditions? I wonder?


What a spectacular end to the tournament...I'd way rather watch a match like that than one where one guy is way out in front at -17.

And how gracious was Kenny Perry? Wow, talk about sportsmanship. There are a lot of trash talking pro athletes who could take a lesson from him.


Even though Tiger didn't win all is good in the world of golf. Honestly, Tiger didn't deserve to win - he didn't play well enough to wear the green jacket. And neither did Phil. But what a great show they put on for us!

Without Tiger and Phil the first 4 hours and 28 minutes of the Sunday broadcast would have been a sleeper. What an incredible sub-plot to the weekend, that only Hollywood could have crafted.

And poor Kenny. He gave it away and couldn't take it back! I was rooting for him or Chad. I thought they were more deserving than Angel, but in the end it is Angel wearing the green jacket.

What looked like a lame Sunday turned out to be something special after all. Only at the Masters!


I couldn't agree more with Paul and Alison's comments.
That's why Golf is what it is...great sportsmanship and great stories.
I agree that Tiger played like shite and yet still finished t-6. The Tiger and Phil show did make the afternoon less snoozy but in the end the guys that played the best were where they deserved to be. Too bad about KP but that is also the nature of the game. There are 72 holes in a tournament not 70..if there were Kenny would be wearing the Green jacket today. Great Masters and now Spring is officially here...